AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395/Z13 Flow Benchmark Roundup: 27 Games, 15 Tools, 5 Different Sources

We compiled a comprehensive, benchmark‐focused deep dive that weaves together every test—from CPU and GPU synthetic scores to real‐world gaming, content creation, AI workloads, and battery life. The data is consolidated from multiple sources (Dave2D, Hardware Canucks, Just Josh, NotebookCheck, and The Phawx) with notes on power modes (wattage settings, VRAM allocations, etc.) so you can see exactly how performance shifts from “silent” energy‐saving modes up to turbo/desktop‐class configurations.

Please support the creators who have published these numbers. Here are our sources:

Benchmark Breakdown: The All‐Around Performance of the ROG Flow Z13

In our deep dive, we’ve aggregated a vast array of benchmarks—from raw Cinebench and 3DMark synthetic tests to real‐world gaming FPS, professional content creation workloads, AI inference, and battery endurance tests. This isn’t just about a single number; it’s about understanding the trade-offs when the ASUS ROG Flow Z13 is pushed in different modes. Whether in “turbo” mode at 60–80W or in “silent” power-saving configurations (down to 35W), each table below is tagged with its source so you get the full picture.

1. CPU Performance: Cinebench & Sustainable Workloads

Across multiple Cinebench tests, the Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 (the Flow Z13’s flagship APU) shows consistently strong performance. In single-run tests on Cinebench 2024 the single-core scores hover around 116–117, while multi-core totals are in the 1,640–1,654 range. (In Cinebench R23, multi-core scores even top 29,000.) Compare these with sustained (10-minute) runs and power‐draw data that reveal an initial draw of about 86 W (dropping to 69 W once thermal limits are met). For example:

Table 1. Cinebench CPU Scores and Power Draw

[Sources: Dave2D, Hardware Canucks, Just Josh, NotebookCheck 1]

Across these tests the CPU remains competitive even against rivals like Apple’s M4 Pro(s) and high‑performance Ryzen 9 HX parts. Small differences of 1–2 points are visible between single-run and sustained modes, largely due to thermal throttling in the limited chassis.

2. GPU Synthetic Benchmarks: 3DMark & Ray Tracing Tests

When it comes to the Radeon 8060S iGPU, synthetic gaming tests show that power configuration matters immensely. For example, Dave2D’s Time Spy Graphics runs on the AMD 8060S (at 70W) yielded scores ranging from 8,812 to 11,037. In comparison, discrete GPUs in similar laptops record noticeably higher numbers. Meanwhile, Just Josh’s tests using 3DMark Time Spy, Port Royal, and 3DMark Wildlife Extreme highlight how the Flow Z13 “turbo” modes boost performance by 5–10% when pushing wattage from 60W to 80W.

Table 2. GPU Synthetic Benchmarks

[Sources: Dave2D, Just Josh]

These scores suggest that while the integrated Radeon 8060S can never outpace a true RTX 4070, it comes closer than many previous iGPU incarnations—especially when pushed above its default power envelope.

3. Gaming Performance: 1080p to 1600p at Ultra/High Detail

In real‐world gaming, the Flow Z13 (often running the Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 paired with Radeon 8060S) produces a broad spectrum of FPS values. Not only do wattage settings (35W “Silent” vs. 60W “Turbo” vs. 80W “Manual”) affect averages, but VRAM allocation adjustments (e.g. 4GB vs. 24GB) can also shift results. Consider these two snapshots:

3.1 1600p – Ultra Detail (Hardware Canucks Data)

3.2 1080p – Detailed 1% and 0.2% FPS (The Phawx Data)

Additional data from NotebookCheck 2 pinpoints performance spans in titles such as GTA V, The Witcher 3, and Monster Hunter Wilds at resolutions ranging from low settings up to 4K—with numbers varying consistently as detail settings change.

[Sources: Hardware Canucks, The Phawx, NotebookCheck 2]

4. Content Creation & Compute Workloads

For creative professionals, the Flow Z13’s rapid render times and media conversion speeds stand out. Whether you’re in Blender, Houdini, or running Handbrake conversions, the system’s CPU/GPU synergy shows up in minutes–or even seconds under GPU‑accelerated modes.

Table 3. Content Creation & Media Conversion Benchmarks

Whether converting 4K footage with Handbrake or exporting a sequence via Premiere Pro, these numbers demonstrate that the Flow Z13 can compete favorably with higher‑power machines in producer workflows.

5. Battery Life: The Trade-Off of Portability

Carrying desktop-class performance in a tablet inevitably means balancing battery endurance against raw power. Under light loads—for example, looping a Chrome refresh at 150 nits—the comparable MacBook Pro (with an M4 Pro and 99.6Wh battery) manages about 18½ hours, while the Flow Z13 (with Ryzen MAX+ 395 and a 70Wh battery) falls to roughly 9:00–9:26. For video playback and YouTube loads, the gap is similar. Heavy-load tests (using Cinebench loops) push the system’s endurance down to around 1½ minutes.

Table 4. Battery Endurance Comparisons

[Source: Hardware Canucks]

6. AI & Inference Workloads: Pushing the APU’s Versatility

Beyond games and content creation, the Flow Z13 is put to work running local language models and image generation tasks. In tests spanning Backyard Ai LLM, LM Studio Ai (Deepseek R1), Procyon Image Generation, and Inference benchmarks, the numbers show that – while not a replacement for dedicated data-center hardware – the APU handles 4K-context AI tasks surprisingly well.

Table 5. AI & Inference Benchmark Highlights

[Source: Hardware Canucks]

7. System & Storage Metrics

A system is only as good as its supporting internals. In addition to raw CPU/GPU performance, the Flow Z13 also scores strongly on PCMark 10, memory copy speeds (AIDA64), and disk benchmarks (CrystalDiskMark) while achieving competitive 3DMark Wildlife Extreme Unlimited scores.

Table 6. System and Storage Benchmarks

[Source: NotebookCheck 1]

8. Multi-Core & Sustained Performance, Plus Power Efficiency

Just Josh’s benchmarks provide additional insight into the Flow Z13’s sustained performance and efficiency. While raw single-run Cinebench scores are high, the 10‑minute repeatability tests indicate that the system’s aggressive cooling (and silent operation) slightly drops peak numbers. Notably, the initial power draw of 86 W falls to about 69 W once thermal equilibrium is reached—insightful for users wanting a balance between performance and battery life.

Table 7. Sustained Performance & Power Draw (Just Josh)

[Source: Just Josh]

The Verdict

AMD’s latest Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 combined with the Radeon 8060S inside the ASUS ROG Flow Z13 clearly delivers a multifaceted performance package. Whether you’re benchmarking on Cinebench, pushing 3DMark in various power modes, or testing frame rates in demanding titles at both 1080p and 1600p—with different VRAM and wattage configurations—the overall story is one of surprising versatility. Creative applications run fast, AI workloads are “good enough” for local inference, and while battery life shows the expected trade-offs of a high‑performance, ultra‑portable device, the Flow Z13 shines as a testament to how integrated graphics and hybrid power management are evolving.

For those who can live with the battery–performance trade-off, this isn’t just a notebook; it’s a portable workstation and gaming juggernaut rolled into one.